FMI Patches
Back to the guides
What has been said

The Dr Ardis nicotine protocol: what circulates and what can be traced

8 min read

People search for the Dr Ardis nicotine protocol because they have heard that he recommends a particular way of using nicotine patches. This guide answers the question as it stands. We could not find a written protocol from Dr Bryan Ardis, in his own words, anywhere we looked. What follows is what circulates, who published each version as far as we can tell, where the versions disagree, and what research exists on each element.

First, the plain answer. Dr Ardis has no connection to FMI Patches. He does not endorse or recommend our patches, and nothing on this page is his advice about them. Nothing here is advice from us either.

Where we looked

We checked his website, including its homepage and site search. The search page returned an error, and the homepage has no patch protocol. We opened the page for his April 2024 episode, "The Other N Word". It has a short summary and no transcript; the transcript section says "Coming Soon". The summary does not mention patches, doses or schedules.

We also opened the page for a 2023 interview with Dr Ben Edwards titled "Nicotine and Long-Covid". It is an audio episode. Its written description says only that Dr Ben interviews Dr Ardis about the use of nicotine for long COVID. The page has no transcript and no patch instructions. An archived forum PDF titled "How To Use Nicotine Protocol" also came up in search, but it returned an error when we tried to open it, so we have not read it.

The gap is real. A protocol given on audio or video would need a transcript or a listen to confirm the steps. We have not done that, so the versions below are what other people have written about him, not his words.

The versions that circulate

We found at least five versions of a patch routine online. They are secondhand. They come from fan sites, forums, critics and news-style articles, and they do not agree with each other.

The first is a single 7 mg patch every 24 hours for six consecutive days. A Substack critique quotes it in the form "1 x 7 mg nicotine patch each 24 hours for 6 consecutive days" and presents it as coming from a Dr Ardis video. The critique links that video on BitChute. We have not opened the video, so we cannot confirm the wording.

The second is a 14 mg patch cut into six pieces, with one small piece used each day, for prevention. It appears in fan-site write-ups that we could not trace to a source we could open, so we treat it as unsourced.

The third is half of a 7 mg patch each day. It also comes from fan-site write-ups, with no source we could open.

The fourth is a patch worn from the morning for 16 to 24 hours, depending on tolerance. The fifth is 16 hours on and 8 hours off, with the patch removed overnight. Both come from fan-site write-ups. The fourth and fifth cannot both describe the same routine.

A sixth item is not a routine. It is a theory that the spike protein carries snake-venom features and that nicotine helps clear it. Critics and a German news-style article describe it. It is not his written words either.

Where the versions conflict

The versions differ on almost every point. They disagree on the number of days, from six days to a course with no length given. They disagree on whether the patch is cut, and on how much of a patch is used. They disagree on wear time, with one saying 24 hours, one saying 16 to 24 hours, and one saying 16 hours with an overnight break.

Because the versions conflict, no single one can be treated as his position. Any copy that quoted one of them as the Ardis protocol would be presenting a secondhand claim as his.

What the research covers

The one published study of nicotine patches in long COVID that we found is a case report plus a survey. The case report describes one 44-year-old woman who received 7 mg per 24 hours for seven consecutive days. The survey asked 231 people who used low-dose transdermal nicotine. The authors describe it as retrospective and not randomised or controlled, and the answers are self-reported. The authors conclude that the approach "appears to be a promising and safe procedure". The paper gives no general dosing protocol, and the authors say "dose-finding studies are required". So the long COVID evidence is one case and an uncontrolled survey. It is not a trial.

The randomised trial we found in COVID-19 tested a 14 mg daily patch in adults on mechanical ventilation in 18 French intensive care units. Of 220 patients randomised, 218 were analysed. Day-28 deaths were 30 of 106 (28%) in the nicotine group and 31 of 112 (28%) in the placebo group. The odds ratio was 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.87), with p of 0.46. The authors wrote: "There is no indication to use nicotine in this situation." That is a negative result, in very sick patients, on one dose. It did not study long COVID or prevention.

The cut-patch version, the half-patch version, the 16 to 24 hour wear schedule and the six-day course have no study that we could find. That is a finding of no study, not of a negative study. The same is true of the venom theory: we found no study of the spike protein as a venom in humans or animals. The hypothesis that nicotine receptors are involved is a hypothesis, and the one trial that tested nicotine in COVID-19 did not test that mechanism.

What the patch label says about cutting

The Habitrol nicotine patch label is an over-the-counter label from another maker, and it is not necessarily the product any version names. On cutting, the label says: "do not cut patch in half or into smaller pieces". We quote that line because it is the cutting instruction on the label we checked.

Labels differ between makers and products, so the line applies to the Habitrol label only. It does not settle what another patch allows. Several circulating versions involve cutting or halving a patch, and they conflict with that label line. We are not offering advice on it. Read the label on the box you hold, and ask a pharmacist before you change how a patch is used.

Where to hear what he says now

His own show is the place to hear his current views. Episodes are on The Dr. Ardis Show website, and the nicotine episodes on other channels are his statements, not ours. If you are working out what he has said, listen to the episode or read its transcript, rather than relying on a summary of it. A summary can be wrong about the detail, including the detail that matters most here, which is the dose and the timing.

Our own note on what he has said about nicotine, including the COVID-19 idea and the eggplant comparison, is in the guide "Dr Ardis and nicotine: what he has said".

The short version

We could not find a written nicotine patch protocol from Dr Ardis. The routines online are secondhand, and they conflict on dose, days and wear time. The research covers one case, one uncontrolled survey and one negative trial in ventilated patients. It covers none of the cutting, halving or wear-schedule versions. The Habitrol label says not to cut a patch in half or into smaller pieces. Dr Ardis has no connection to this store and does not endorse our patches.

These sources are about nicotine in general and about what has been said. None of them is a study of this patch.

7 mg a patch, every ingredient named

30 patches a box from $12.75, with a 60-day money-back guarantee.

Choose a box